The average 2.4 GHz throughput over all points measured shows the TP-LINK has a significant advantage over both other products in both directions. The photo below shows the TP-LINK Archer C5 V2 in the test chamber. This method is intended to keep maximum distance between the router under test and chamber antennas. The chamber antennas are also centered on the turntable (front-to-back of chamber). Our standard practice is to center the router under test’s antennas on the turntable, both front-to-back and side-to-side in the chamber. The only difference between the standard Version 9 test and the “special” test category is in the channels used. Those two products have a “special” wireless designation color code. For comparison, I’ve included the only other two AC1200 class devices that have been tested so far – the Luma Surround WRTQ329ACN and the eero Home Wi-Fi System A010001. For throughput testing, all tests were run using our recently updated Version 9 Wireless test process with version 3.17.1 Build 20160201 Rel. The TP-LINK Archer C5 V2 is Wi-Fi certified. Most failed tests related to DNS and UPnP functions related to the DHCP server. The functional score of 91% equates to 22 failed tests, which is a decent score. For UDP, it was able to establish all 3000 connections, but couldn’t keep them all open long enough (3 minutes) for the confirmation pass in the UDP test. But the Archer C5V2 failed both, establishing only 198 out of 3000 TCP/IP connections. Most products fail the new maximum UDP connection test and pass the TCP connection test. The gist of all this is that the Luma is a much more powerful wired router than the Archer C5 V2. Luma also outperformed the Archer C5 V2 by an even larger margin for Total Simultaneous UDP performance vs. ![]() The chart above shows Luma had almost exactly double the unidirectional TCP/IP throughput compared to the Archer C5 V2. This maximum is lower than 1000 Mbps because it includes protocol overhead.Īs noted in previous reviews using the V4 testing methodology, Total Simultaneous TCP/IP throughput is proving to be a better performance differentiator. About all the designs have in common is the placement of rear panel components.īoth products delivered unidirectional TCP/IP routing throughput over 900 Mbps in both directions, with Luma hitting the 941 Mbps maximum achievable rate in the test. ![]() The V2 design uses separate devices for CPU and each radio.Ĭompared to the Archer C5 V1 board below, you can see that the C5 V2 is a completely different design. Note the original QCA-based design used a router SoC with built-in 2.4 GHz 3×3 radio. The 2.4 and 5 GHz modules are at the upper left of the image the Broadcom SOC is shown center right. The image below shows the top of the TP-LINK Archer C5 V2 board with heat sinks and RF shields removed. – QCA9880 3-stream 802.11ac radio solution – SiGE / Skyworks SE2576L 2.4 GHz power amps (x2) – Skyworks SE2574BL-R 2.4 GHz power amps (x3) We’ll do a more detailed component comparison shortly. V2 is a true 2X2 configuration with only two antennas based on a Broadcom platform. The Archer C5 V2 is a completely different animal based on an entirely different chipset. This gave the original C5 an unfair advantage that earned it a SNB #1 Ranked award. So it linked at 217 / 450 Mbps (20 / 40 MHz bandwidth) when used with a 3×3 2.4 GHz client. Firmware limited the 5 GHz maximum link rate to 867 Mbps, but the 2.4 GHz radio link rate wasn’t capped. It was actually a de-featured Archer C7 (3X3 radios) with three external and three internal antennas. Version 1 Archer C5 was a bit of an oddball router. We reviewed the original version of the Archer C5 in Part 1 of our AC1200 roundup. Which brings us to TP-Link’s Archer C5 Version 2. Many of today’s mobile devices have only 2×2 802.11ac radios anyway, which are a perfect match for a less expensive AC1200 router vs. ![]() Yet AC1200 routers still can provide a performance boost over your current 802.11n router and are perfectly fine for networks in small spaces and only a few Wi-Fi devices. Prodded on by router marketeers, buyers are opting for bigger numbers on their router boxes along with (much) higher prices. There’s not a lot of buzz about AC1200 class routers these days. Typical Price: $106 Buy From Amazon Introduction TP-LINK AC1200 Wireless Dual Band Gigabit Router (Archer C5 V2) īroadcom-based AC1200 router with Gigabit Ethernet ports and USB 2.0 storage and printer sharing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |